-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 431
Fix concurrent access to libraries manager gRPC functions. #2480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The presence of the Index* fileds inside LibraryManager didn't give any functional benefit.
It does make things more complicated without any actual benefit.
The original LibrariresManager has been split into three objects with specific goals: * The Builder object is used to construct a new LibrariesManager. It has methods to add librarires directories and to build the LibrariesManager. * The Explorer object is used to query the LibrariesManager about installed libraries. * The Installer object is used to rescan installed libraries and to install and uninstall.
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2480 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 67.55% 67.61% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 207 205 -2
Lines 20759 20844 +85
==========================================
+ Hits 14023 14094 +71
- Misses 5590 5597 +7
- Partials 1146 1153 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
See how to contribute
before creating one)
our contributing guidelines
UPGRADING.mdhas been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)configuration.schema.jsonupdated if new parameters are added.What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR aims to make all library-related commands behave correctly when used in high-concurrency environments.
What is the current behavior?
No behavior changes (in theory...).
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?
No
Other information
Should fix #2457